Will Cap Gemini Tell You Who Has the Best BI Software?

Question: Will Cap Gemini Tell You Who Has the Best ERP Software?

The Advice that Cap Gemini Gives on BI Software

Enterprise software buyers go to Cap Gemini because they are supposedly “experts” in many topics, including business intelligence. It is true that Cap Gemini has many consultants with many years of experience in these topics. However, when we evaluate the ERP software that Cap Gemini recommends to its clients, it is uniformly the software from the large and expensive software vendors like SAP and Oracle. However, these applications, SAP BI/BW or Oracle BI have the highest TCO, have poor levels of innovation, and lack many of the features of more modern BI systems from other brands. However, clients of Cap Gemini generally don’t purchase or implement these far more effective BI systems. Cap Gemini somehow convinces their clients that these are leading applications, when they are not. IBM does the same thing to its clients with its dated Cognos application.

Where Can You Find These Applications?

Unfortunately, the best BI software resides primarily with software vendors that do not offer the major consulting companies their consulting business to Cap Gemini in return for Cap Gemini recommending their software to their clients. If you want to evaluate or purchase these superior and lower TCO applications, you should expect resistance from your consulting partner. This is because they only want you to purchase software that they have resources trained up on and ready to bill hours – regardless of whether this is either the right software for you, or even good software.

Understanding Cap Gemini’s Institutional Structure

However, Cap Gemini is not working off of any research orientation, but is instead steering it’s clients into purchasing the application that makes Cap Gemini the most money, and they will come up with any argument necessary in order to achieve this objective, including providing misinformation about the applications they are “recommending.”


Controlling for Bias

It is not necessary to accept such biased advice. However biased advice is quite standard in enterprise software. In fact, it is the identical issue to financial information, where the advisers are incentivized to lead their clients to investments that make the most money for the financial advisor.

It is reasonable to expect better, but before selecting a source of information, it is essential to set the criteria which control for bias and results in the selection of sources that have their client’s interests as a primary concern — and few entities that offer enterprise software advice do. We propose the following criteria:

  1. Controlling for Bias: The source must be financially unbiased. That is the source must not financially benefit from their client’s decisions. Consulting companies break this rule when they perform both software selection as well as software implementation — as most of the money resides in the software implementation. If their clients choose the software, they have consultants ready to bill in they make substantially more money than if the client goes in a different direction. IT analyst break this rule when they market services to software vendors while selling research to buyers. Both are seriously financially biased — casting considerable doubt on their recommendations.
  2. Transparency: Major consulting companies receive the consulting business in return for their recommendation to specific vendors, but hide this from their clients. IT analysts are quiet about the services they sell to vendors that they then rate. Clients are never told this explicitly by these entities, and these entities prefer not to divulge their conflicts of interest. They should not have these conflicts in the first place, but at the very least they must list these conflicts prominently on their websites.
  3. Independence of Though: The source must have the confidence to recommend not merely large brands, but must be able to recommend the right application and vendor based upon their merits.
  4. The Importance of a Research Basis to Support Contentions: The source must produce or at least reference actual research. Anecdotes are easy to come by and are primarily what the major consulting companies offer. However, they perform no analysis to support their anecdotes. Many of the anecdotes presented by major consulting companies turned out to be false when scrutinized and compared with research. This was shown conclusively for the topic of ERP in the book The Real Story Behind ERP: Separating Fact from Fiction. The research follows specific and rigorous rules, and if these rules are not adhered to than it is not valid research. These rules, and how one enterprise software entity which claims to perform research are explained in detail in the book by Gartner and the Magic Quadrant: A Guide for Buyers, Vendors, Investors. In this book, they are compared against university research, The RAND Corporation, and Consumer Reports.
  5. No Focus on Profit Maximization: If the only dedication of an information source is making money, the advice provided will be biased and of poor quality. The financial advisory area also demonstrates this irrefutably. This is why most of the research in the US and internationally come out of universities which are non-profit.

How to Improve Outcomes

Enterprise software decision making is in a poor state. Implementation failure rates continue to be high, and the major advisory firms continue to dispense exceedingly poor advice. The relationship between the business users and the business with IT is strained at the vast majority of companies, and companies are not able to come anywhere close to leveraging the potential of enterprise software. In areas ranging from forecasting to finance & accounting, companies pay far too much for underperforming software. The most prominent enterprise software advisers are the most to blame for this state of affairs — and it primarily comes down to their financial bias. They make more money when their clients make bad decision. They have no financial incentive to help them make good decisions.

Reasonable Expectations

One cannot expect to receive intelligently selected software, an effective planned implementation, risk-appropriate software or a low maintenance solution relying upon biased sources of information that place their interests ahead of your own – and who approach every question from the perspective of “how can we make more money from their decision?

Getting The Real Story

You get the real story about vendors, and information technology trends per software category, without any connection to some line of business. There is no one manipulating the data to steer you into a decision that maximizes their some organizational incentive program. That is called getting the real story.

Research is Our Only Business

We perform serious research, and research is our only business. We provide both written explanations, but many calculators and estimators to empower you to come to your own conclusions (see below).

Enterprise Software Estimation Database

We maintain the largest and most accurate enterprise software estimation database in the world. Unlike companies that provide research only to begin a consulting relationship, our calculators are self-service. We have 0% financial bias and are not focused on profit maximization. Therefore, we can afford to perform actual research. Our research offerings can be reviewed from the menu above or from the table below.

Questions?

If you have any questions, contact us with the contact form to the right.

Analytical Products

LinkDescription
Honest Vendor RatingsSoftware vendors rated on innovation, reliability, etc.
Software Category AnalysisHigh level analysis of covered software categories
MUFI Ratings & RiskOur application ratings & risk estimation
Project Planning PackagesInteractive calculator providing FTE, duration, finish date estimates.
Enterprise Software TCO CalculatorsInteractive TCO calculation; software costs, hardware costs, implementation costs & maintenance costs.
Solution Architecture PackagesCost comparisons between different solution architectures.