What This Article Covers
- Why are SAP Contracts Becoming so Complex?
- Publicly Supporting Open Connections, While In Reality Offering Control?
- The Increased Overhead of Using SAP
- The Increased Need for Clause Clarification
SAP talks a lot about simplification, but SAP’s contracts are becoming more complex and more limiting in terms of what customers can do with SAP’s software. In this article, we will get into this little topic for which there is so little published information.
Example of the Cloud Connector
SAP has the following to say about its Cloud Connector.
An analysis by a commenter stated the following:
It is supported to run S/4 HANA on AWS as IaaS provider, the same for SCP (fka HCP). But it really seems not wanted to use more from AWS than the virtual OS. You even have to solve basics like connectivity yourself when you leave the SAP world. “Must not” – a license restriction?
Publicly Supporting Open Connections, While In Reality Offering Control?
Once again, SAP restricts the usage of its products to other SAP products. This is done even after SAP proposing that it is in favor of open standards. It should be remembered that middleware companies never limit the usage of their adapters. However, SAP does.
This type of language is littered all through SAP’s contract documentation. It is an orientation to control things, so they maximally benefit SAP. So that SAP controls how the software is used. This is a growing problem and liability with using SAP. Actually, by upgrading to newer versions of SAP, the customer ends up with more restrictions than in older versions, so the restrictions are being ratcheted up.
Control and the Cloud
SAP talks a good game about partnering with Azure, but the control they want combined with public hosting like Azure or AWS means things get super weird. You are making me think about another article Rolf! That is the second time in a week!
Recently I spent time trying to figure out what a contract restriction means or S/4HANA with the person at an SAP customer.
The SAP account executive has no idea what the clause means. It actually took them three weeks to come back with a clarification that did not seem to clarify anything.
This all means the legal overhead in using SAP is increasing. And attorneys aren’t enough. The customer’s attorney has to work with an IT contract person because figuring out the definition means combining IT with legal.
Who is the Most Accurate Source on SAP?
Want to find out? See... A Study into The Accuracy of SAP