What This Article Covers

  • What is a private fleet freight brokering marketplace conceptually? 
  • What are they necessary? 
  • Why would a freight brokering service / marketplace that focused on private fleet backhauls (and in some cases whenever the private fleet has excess capacity be a good idea? 

Background

This article originated from an analysis of how outsourced transportation had been oversold for quite some time. One of the major benefits of outsourced transportation is that the transportation company can use the fact that it moves much more freight that most private fleets to move freight both directions and reduce the amount of deadhead miles. This is in fact, probably the most compelling benefit of outsourced transportation. However, the assumption has always been that the freight must be within the carrier’s network in order for this efficient allocation of transportation resources to take place. However, is this the case?

What Is Required?

First a private carrier must apply to operate as a for hire carrier, which is a requires filing legal documentation and keeping rates on file with the state. They can use a standard freight carriage contract, or they use a service certain brokers, they may have to use the freight contract employed by the broker. In fact according to Trucking Partners, around 53% of private fleets are registered as for hire carriers, and some percentage of the other 47% also carry solicited freight through what is essentially a loophole called trip-leasing, where a private fleet truck can run under the authority of a common carrier for a “trip.” It is also recognized that many private fleets are very active in soliciting freight for their backhauls. If fact, roughly 70% of private fleets sell enough of their capacity to other customers that they are able to run their private fleet as a revenue center. However, on the other hand, some private fleets can become obsessed with getting profits from the private fleet as is noted in this quote.

Many private fleets spread themselves too thin in the quest for the attraction of revenue-producing freight.  They send their equipment all over the place and forget to provide the quality of service expected by their parent company.  The successful private fleets that exercise for-hire options solicit business within existing traffic lanes.  In other words, the for-hire option is simply supplemental to private operators.

Trucking Partners brings up the following good points that a private fleet needs to ask itself:

  1. Can drivers and equipment be delayed long enough to accommodate the pickup and delivery of backhaul loads? 
  2. Is the equipment suitable for implementation of a backhaul program? 
  3. Do you have a good handle on your costs?  - You need to understand the impact of providing “for-hire” activity on your operation in terms of equipment delays, out-of-route miles, drivers’ hours of service, etc.
  4. Do you have the ability to solicit freight? - It’s a competitive market out there and freight won’t just appear because you want to fill an empty lane. Your services must be sold and coordinated . . . that’s our job!

Therefore it’s clearly a trade-off going for common carriage freight. However, when it comes to the effort of managing for hire freight, there are companies like Simon Transport that can manage the process of getting freight for backhauls. Therefore, this does not have to necessarily be performed by the in-house transportation department. Interestingly as recently as the 1980′s it was not legal for private fleets to haul freight for companies other than their parent company (most likely due to legislation introduced by the lobbyists for common carriers). Furthermore, those that do contract out their private fleet or solicit freight for backhauls only report a cost reduction of 10% per mile.

Freight brokerage web-based boards are common at this point. One which I discussed in the previous article was The SuperBoard, which is one of the biggest. However, most of them come across as amateurish. Also, it’s probably not a good thing to have many web boards as this means the companies looking for trucks or private fleets looking for loads have to search multiple sites, which is inefficient. In fact, the internet based freight information sites seem underdeveloped, and I would not at all be surprised if freight brokering still very much relied upon personal relationships, phone calls and emails. However this true of freight boards generally, and does not say anything in particular about the options available to private fleets versus common carriers.

Focused on Private Fleets?

Interestingly I was not able to find many freight boards online that focused on private fleets. I did find a freight broker that focused on private fleets called Private Fleet Backhaul (PFBH). According to their website “PFBH will move 23,000+ loads in 2011 via private/dedicated fleets, with revenue that will place us in the top 5% of freight brokerages nationwide.” Another site called Backhaul Direct has a very slick site, and is clearly focused on filling backhauls, although it is not directed towards private fleets. However, this is little reason a private fleet could not sign up for this service.

Conclusion

There does seem to be a missed opportunity in the area of a private fleet freight brokering marketplace. Private fleets that require backhaul loads is a huge market, and have slightly different needs than common carriers. A freight brokering marketplace that only focused on these companies would make good sense. This should go beyond simply being a marketplace, and as with Backhaul Direct, stipulate a common freight contract that all private fleets must adhere to. Likely customers for such a marketplace would be shippers with less sensitive time delivery windows who are looking for a good price on freight movement.

References

http://www.freightbrokerbootcamp.com/blog/what-is-a-backhaul/

http://www.truckingpartners.com/private_fleet_solutions/

http://www.worldtradewt100.com/articles/shippers-are-adding-private-fleets-to-their-transportation-mix

{ 0 comments }

The Overestimation of Outsourced Logistics

April 7, 2012

What This Article Covers Why do companies maintain private fleets? Why is outsourced transportation always so highly promoted while few people promote private fleets?  What is the real history of outsourced road transportation?  How well has 3PL met its promises?  What parts of the transportation industry tend to be outsourced?  Background There is a general misimpression presented that [...]

Read the full article →

Why Outsourced Supply Chain Planning?

March 19, 2012

What This Article Covers Why outsourced supply chain planning?  Why large and influential companies with loads of marketing muscle, industry connection, and compliant media (like eWeek) had problems selling this service. Why is outsourced supply chain planning a valid concept? What are some of the important criteria which an outsourced supply chain planning company must [...]

Read the full article →

How IBM, Accenture, and i2 Failed At Outsourced Supply Chain Planning

March 19, 2012

What This Article Covers A bit about the history of the term 4PL Other types of Supply Chain Outsourcing A review of a ridiculous article by eWeek where eWeek allows IBM to use it as a marketing outlet. Background In comments on this blog, I have been asked to provide an example of a 4PL. [...]

Read the full article →

Are Amazon and Lightning Source 4PLs?

March 18, 2012

What This Article Covers A bit about the history of the term 4PL The development of outsourced shipping with Amazon and Lightning Source Background Since the term 4PL was developed, it has been adopted as a term by 3PLs, (also a misnomer as most 3PLs are nothing more than transportation  companies with a lot of [...]

Read the full article →

How 3PLs are Decreasing Workers Standards of Living

December 21, 2011

Background When I first began this blog, I focused on the illusive 4PL concept. The 4PL practice is based upon technology, creating technology platforms which improve the coordination of asset oriented logistics providers. I am still asked who are 4PL companies. I answer “no one.” There is no one who meets the actual criteria of [...]

Read the full article →

Why Service Parts Are Perfect for 4PL

April 22, 2010

What This Article is About What is the relationship between 4Pls and service parts? Why are they a natural fit for one another? How common are 4PL’s for service parts in reality? Why 4PL? A fourth party logistics providers is a company that holds no physical logistics assets, but coordinates the supply chain though its [...]

Read the full article →

7PL is a Deliberately False Concept

February 4, 2010

What is 7PL? 7PL is a concept that combines the 3PLs with 4PLs to make what they refer to as 7PLs. The advantages of this concept are the following: One service provider can now provide a client with both 3PL and 4PL services with a complete 7PL solution to clients and can undertake turnkey projects [...]

Read the full article →

A Good Reason Why SAP SCM Cannot Penetrate 3PLs

August 1, 2009

Problem Breaking In SAP SCM has very few 3PLs as customers. Why is this? SAP SCM offers a modules which address: Transportation Planning and Vehicle Scheduling (TP/VS) Event Management (EM) Extended Warehouse Management (EWM) One reason 3PLs do not select SCM no doubt has to do with its cost (both implementation and maintenance as well [...]

Read the full article →

Is the Idea of Consulting Based 4PLs Believable?

July 25, 2009

Book on 4PL We have recently been reading Fourth Party Logistics: The Future of Fourth Party Logistics: The Future of Supply Chain Outsourcing? by Serafettin Kutlu. Serafettin sets up the scenario with the following: 1994 Andersen Consulting survey of 250 organizations in the UR round that two-thirds of respondents actually felt that their initial expectations [...]

Read the full article →