What This Article Covers

  • Does selling online change the opportunities for moving to make to stock? 
  • How selling online changes how long customers will be willing to wait for their purchases to arrive.
  • What does all of this mean for forecasting? 

Background

I described in the previous article that many companies that talk about their desire to move to a make to stock environment, will never get there, and that a make to stock environment, if your customers are not willing to wait for your normal lead times is either completely impossible, or greatly increases the costs to provide the item as well as reducing the quality level of the item.

The rise in online commerce is something that companies should include in their supply chain strategy. However, it is not apparent that the move towards online ordering radically changes the strategies that are available to companies. Instead, it provides some extra leeway, that can be used to reduce supply chain costs, and to postpone the final assembly depending upon the assembly lead time. 

Buying and Selling Online

We are in the middle of large changes in retailing. Online retailing has tremendous advantages over buying in stores. These include the following:

  1. Far greater selection
  2. More and less biased information. This is in fact one of Amazon’s great assets, its review database. When people shop in stores, there are no product descriptions and no objective reviews in the store. Stores have a poor information quality to them. That is the information about products is both low, and the only sources of information tend to be the biased salespeople in the store.
  3. Convenience (no driving to a store, finding parking, walking around the store)
  4. Speed
  5. The ability to be shown truly related products (Amazon does this very well)
  6. The ability to try out some products (such as read parts of books and listen to music), although the ability to try or test other products is a disadvantages (such as trying on clothes or shoes, or driving a car).
However for many years, poor e-commerce websites combined with trust issues, and the resistance that many people had to changing their shopping habits, restricted online sales from being much of overall retail sales. However, that is rapidly changing. I believe that it is soon to reach a tipping point, and will see many physical stores close completely or shrink the number of stores they have. This brings up an important point about the opportunities this presents for product postponement to companies.

How are Customers Being Habituated to Wait for Their Products

Buying online is providing more opportunities for assemble to order as consumers are becoming accustomed to waiting a few days for their order to arrive by courier, even if the item is stocked. This is a change from the time when people went to stores, expecting to walk out with the item in hand. This may allow companies that sell online to extend the time between ordering and when the product is received, but taking a day or two to assemble the product. Once a consumer is prepared to wait 2 days for their order, they may be willing to wait a few days longer. However, these are assemble to order opportunities, not make to order opportunities. If some customization is performed on the item (such as monograming or configuration options), this does not change the fact that this is assemble to order. Online purchases do not increase the market for build to stock item much more than what they have always been.

Conclusion

While some companies may think this creates opportunities to move to make to order, in fact its hard to see how it does. Make to order means that procurement orders are sent out when the order is received. However, this produces too long of an overall lead time unless the product is truly customized. However, the opportunities for assemble to order are clearly increasing and this will mean more forecasting at the assembly or component level than at the finished product. The needs for forecasting will be just as great, just at a different level in the bill of material.

{ 0 comments }

The Illusion of Moving to a Make to Order Environment

May 16, 2012

What This Article Covers Why do companies continually propose they will move to a make to order environment? The extra costs associated with moving make to stock environments to make to order.  Why cant the vast majority of companies move to a make to order environment? What considerations are left out of common proposals to [...]

Read the full article →

The Real Story Behind Judgement Adjustments to Statistical Forecasting

April 10, 2012

What This Article Covers Why is the common opinion or perception about judgement methods incorrect?  What is the reason for this misimpression?  What does the research say about judgement adjustments to statistical forecasting? Background This article began while performing research for Outsource My SCP, an outsourced planning service that we are not offering.  This article was published [...]

Read the full article →

Is the Forecast Improved by Including More People?

March 16, 2012

What This Article Covers What are the major categories of manual involvement in supply chain forecasting? What is the current thinking in companies on input to the forecast? How to test whether an individual will provide input which will improve forecast accuracy. Background There are really three categories of obtaining forecast input from different people who apply [...]

Read the full article →

How to Properly Implement Best Fit Functionality

March 16, 2012

What This Article Covers What are the important steps in implementing best fit? Why is the best fit historical accuracy always lower than what the future forecasting accuracy will be? Background Best fit functionality is an automated procedure which attempts to fit the past history using different forecasting models which is covered in detail in [...]

Read the full article →

Forecast Simulation

March 15, 2012

What This Article Covers What is forecast simulation? What can forecast simulation be used to test? What can be leveraged from other types of simulation which is more common in supply chain planning? Definition Forecast simulation is an infrequently used term. In fact one of the few hits on Google for “forecast simulation” that applies [...]

Read the full article →

How Executives Reduce Forecast Accuracy

March 15, 2012

What This Article Covers What are the things that executives do to reduce forecast accuracy? Why is setting realistic goals so important? Why do executives often select forecasting software with such poor implementability? Background There are several ways in which executives reduce forecast accuracy. They include the following: Directly reducing accuracy through the direct forecast adjustment. [...]

Read the full article →

Naive Forecast Defintion

March 15, 2012

 What This Article Covers What is a naive forecast? How can they be used? Why can more complex methods be made to better fit the forecast history? Definition Naive Forecast – Named as such as the forecast is unsophisticated. A naive forecast is not a specific forecasting model, although it is sometimes defined as simply [...]

Read the full article →

Can Your Forecast Beat the Naive Forecast?

March 15, 2012

What This Article Covers What is a naive forecast? Why is it important to create a baseline with the naive forecast? How long should you test the naive forecast against the currently generated forecast? Background In a recent article I described how companies don’t know how much they can improve their forecast accuracy. In the [...]

Read the full article →

Best Fit Forecasting Definition

March 15, 2012

What This Article Covers What is best fit forecasting functionality? Why it is called best fit? Why can more complex methods be made to better fit the forecast history? Definition Best-Fit Functionality – A software procedure that fits the past history using different forecasting models. It then ranks the different models based upon their distance [...]

Read the full article →